Skip to main content
Logo for Printed Page The National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities
NICHCY > Research > Research Summaries Helping At-Risk Students Meet Standards: A Synthesis of Evidence-Based Classroom Practices
Helping At-Risk Students Meet Standards: A Synthesis of Evidence-Based Classroom Practices  
Summary View | Full Abstract
Feedback Icon Rate this Page
Rated 1 (out of 5) by 1 people


   

Title

 Helping At-Risk Students Meet Standards: A Synthesis of Evidence-Based Classroom Practices  


Author

 Barley, Z., Lauer, P.A., Arens, S.A., Apthorp, H.S., Englert, K.S., Snow, D., & Akiba, M. 

Source

 Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning 

Year Published

 2002 

Background

Peer tutoring* is an intervention that has been widely studied as a means of helping low-achieving students meet standards. Given the intent of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 that all children attain standards, this strategy becomes one of importance. Peer tutoring involves pairs of students working with each other in the learning process. It may involve students of equal ability trading roles of tutor and student, or an academically stronger student paired with an academically weaker student. When students are in or close to the same grade level, the method is considered peer tutoring; when 1 of the 2 students is in a significantly higher grade level, then it is considered tutoring. Two previous meta-analyses have been completed on peer tutoring, specifically on mathematics. However, these had some methodological limitations; researchers were not precise about the amount of the learning increase or about the conditions under which positive effects are likely to occur (Cohen et al., 1982).

Research Questions

The purpose of this synthesis was to describe and discuss relevant findings of 4 peer-tutoring strategies that occur within the scope of the regular classroom teacher. They were divided into four subcategories: Classwide Peer Tutoring (CWPT), Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS), Reciprocal Peer Tutoring (RPT), and studies that explored variations on CWPT.

Findings

  1. CWPT was effective for low-SES and low-achieving elementary students in spelling, reading, and math. Well-developed materials were available to support teacher use.
  2. Preliminary evidence supported the effectiveness of PALS with elementary school children with learning disabilities* in math and reading. Results were positive, with large effect sizes for PALS, plus teacher-provided, advanced mini-lessons on new material.
  3. The studies on Reciprocal Peer Tutoring (RPT) provided conclusive evidence of the effectiveness of peer tutoring for elementary children identified as low achieving in math.

Conclusion/Recommendations

There is evidence that peer tutoring, when it is well developed and supported, can improve the performance of low-achieving students. The following bullet points summarize important elements in this strategy:

  • Teachers will need training and logistical support to initiate peer tutoring.
  • Tutoring activities are highly structured.
  • Teachers carefully monitor tutoring behaviors.
  • Tutoring participants receive specific training.
  • Students are well prepared for the tutoring role, and during tutoring sessions, teachers monitor the tutoring activity and provide feedback on proper procedures.
  • Materials must be developed for weekly use, including tutoring materials such as flash cards and assessment materials.
  • Time and process for the tutoring sessions must be established and pairing arrangements planned.



Feedback Icon The material presented here is:
"Not Very Useful" "Very Useful"
Additional feedback helps us better help you :

Readers are encouraged to copy and share this information, but please credit the National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities (NICHCY). NICHCY relies on feedback from users to enhance our collection, development, and dissemination of information. We encourage you to share your ideas and feedback with us! Please contact us at our email address (nichcy@aed.org) or visit the NICHCY Feedback Page at: www.nichcy.org/Pages/Feedback.aspx.

NICHCY thanks our Project Officer, Dr. Judy L. Shanley, at the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP), U.S. Department of Education.

Publication of this Web resource page is made possible through Cooperative Agreement #H326N030003 between the Academy for Educational Development and the Office of Special Education Programs of the U.S. Department of Education. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Education, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

NICHCY · 1825 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 700 · Washington, DC 20009
(800) 695-0285 v/tty · (202) 884-8441 fax
nichcy@aed.org · www.nichcy.org